Sovereignty in a multipolar world
Main Article Content
Abstract
Welcome to the third issue of The Africa Governance Papers. This issue offers a range of topics, emphasising considerations relating to China’s presence in Africa and its influence on the continent.
The contributions to this issue include research on Chinese media in Africa, the pedagogical challenges of teaching and learning Chinese for Africans, Chinese companies’ approach to social responsibility, the activities of Chinese vloggers in Africa, and China’s influence on African attempts to ensure digital sovereignty. Other articles explore the views of NGO staff members in several countries around the continent on the effectiveness of the African Peer Review Mechanism, and the link between population density, developmental outcomes, and perceptions of governance in sub-Saharan Africa. We also review a reconsideration of a classic of African studies and a recent book that asks whether politics corrupts or whether politics attracts the corrupt. The issue concludes with a detailed study of the ethnic composition of Rwanda’s civil service.
The issue of China’s influence in Africa raises the question of the continent’s relationships with the hegemonic powers of our age more generally. The editorial reflects on the question of sovereignty in an emerging multipolar age. Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has brought the relevance of sovereignty in contemporary international relations to the fore, and it is arguable that a multipolar world involving the predominance of several great powers presents challenges for other countries that will require careful evaluation.
Article Details
References
Adebajo, A. (2016). The revolt against the West: Intervention and sovereignty. Third World Quarterly, 37(7), 1187–1202. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2 016.1154434
Aladekomo, A. S. (2022). Russian aggression against Ukraine, sovereignty and international law. SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4064020
Aluf, D. (2023, March 31). China ramps up its efforts to shape a multipolar world. The China Project. https://thechinaproject.com/2023/03/31/china-ramps-up- its-efforts-to-shape-a-multipolar-world/
Bartelson, J. (2006). The concept of sovereignty revisited. European Journal of International Law, 17(2), 463–474. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chl006
Bauder, H., & Mueller, R. (2023). Westphalian vs. indigenous sovereignty: Challenging colonial territorial governance. Geopolitics, 28(1), 156–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2021.1920577
Bergmann, M., Dolbaia, T., & Fenton, N. (2022). Russia’s adaptation game: Deciphering the Kremlin’s “humanitarian policy” (Brief). Center for Strategic and International Studies. https://www.csis.org/analysis/russias-adaptation- game-deciphering-kremlins-humanitarian-policy
Biscop, S. (2022, June 13). How the war in Ukraine shapes the multipolar world. Egmont. https://www.egmontinstitute.be/how-the-war-in-ukraine-shapes- the-multipolar-world/
Bonilla, Y. (2017). Unsettling sovereignty. Cultural Anthropology, 32(3), 330–339. Bull, H. (1980). The great irresponsibles? The United States, the Soviet Union, and
world order. International Journal, 35(3), 437–447.
Callahan, W. A. (2016). China’s Belt and Road Initiative and the New Eurasian Order
(No. 22). Norwegian Institute of International Affairs.
Chen, Z., & Pan, Z. (2016). Which polarity? Power and world order. In M. Telò (Ed.), Globalisation, Multilateralism, Europe: Towards a Better Global Governance? (pp. 75–90). Routledge.
Coe, B. N. (2019). Sovereignty in the South: Intrusive regionalism in Africa, Latin America, and Southeast Asia (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi. org/10.1017/9781108654821
Sovereignty in an emerging multipolar world
© The Africa Governance Papers, 2023, Vol 1 Issue 3 15
The Africa Governance Papers
Cohen, J. L. (2004). Whose sovereignty? Empire versus international law. Ethics & International Affairs, 18(3), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7093.2004. tb00474.x
Craven, M. (2012). Colonialism and domination. In B. Fassbender & A. Peters (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the History of International Law (pp. 862–889). Oxford University Press.
Gaddis, J. L. (1992). International relations theory and the end of the cold war. International Security, 17(3), 5–58.
Gering, T. (2023, March 21). The Saudi-Iran deal: China’s first geopolitical moonwalk. The China Project. https://thechinaproject.com/2023/03/21/the- saudi-iran-deal-chinas-first-geopolitical-moonwalk/
Grovogui, S. N. (2002). Regimes of sovereignty: International morality and the African condition. European Journal of International Relations, 8(3), 315–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066102008003001
Hansen, T. B., & Stepputat, F. (2006). Sovereignty revisited. Annual Review
rights, et cetera etcetera. Fordham Law Review, 68(1), 1–14.
Hill, F., & Stent, A. (2022). The world Putin wants: How distortions about the past
feed delusions about the future. Foreign Affairs, 101(5), 1080–1112, 114–122.
Jie, Y., & Wallace, J. (2021, September 13). What is China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI)? Chatham House. https://www.chathamhouse.org/2021/09/what- chinas-belt-and-road-initiative-bri
Jurgens, R. (2022, March 30). South African intelligence services are fluent in NoSpeak. The Mail & Guardian. https://mg.co.za/thoughtleader/opinion/2022- 03-30-south-african-intelligence-services-are-fluent-in-nospeak/
Krasner, S. D. (2001). Sovereignty. Foreign Policy, 122, 20. https://doi. org/10.2307/3183223
Kyris, G. (2022). State recognition and dynamic sovereignty. European Journal of International Relations, 28(2), 287–311. https://doi. org/10.1177/13540661221077441
Legarda, H. (2018). China as a conflict mediator | Merics. Mercator Institute of China Studies. https://merics.org/de/kommentar/china-conflict-mediator
–315. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev. Henkin, L. (1999). That “s” word: Sovereignty, and globalization, and human
of Anthropology, 35(1), anthro.35.081705.123317
© The Africa Governance Papers, 2023, Vol 1 Issue 3
Maizland, L. (2022, November 4). Global climate agreements: Successes and failures. Council on Foreign Relations. https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/paris- global-climate-change-agreements
Matthies, V. (1985). The “Spirit of Bandung” 1955–1985: Thirty years since the Bandung Conference. Intereconomics, 20(5), 207–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/ BF02926965
Nadkarmi, V. (2010). Bipolarism and Its End, From the Cold War to the Post-Cold War World. In Oxford Research Encyclopaedia of International Studies. Oxford University Press.
Navalny “poisoned”: What are Novichok agents and what do they do? (2020, March 12). BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-43377698
Paris, R. (2020). The right to dominate: How old ideas about sovereignty pose new challenges for world order. International Organization, 74(3), 453–489. https:// doi.org/10.1017/S0020818320000077
Philpott, D. (2020). Sovereignty. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2020). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https:// plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/sovereignty/
Putin’s poisons: 2020 attack on Aleksey Navalny. (2022, April 18). U.S. Embassy in Georgia. https://ge.usembassy.gov/putins-poisons-2020-attack-on-aleksey- navalny/
Rabkin, J. A. (2004). The case for sovereignty: Why the world should welcome American independence. American Enterprise Institute.
Roth, A. (2018, July 5). Russia denies any involvement in latest UK novichok poisoning. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/jul/05/ russia-asks-why-would-it-plan-novichok-attack-world-cup-uk-poisoning
Shapiro, J., & Puglierin, J. (2023, April 4). The art of vassalisation: How Russia’s war on Ukraine has transformed transatlantic relations. European Council on Foreign Relations. https://ecfr.eu/publication/the-art-of-vassalisation-how- russias-war-on-ukraine-has-transformed-transatlantic-relations/
Sheehan, J. J. (2006). The problem of sovereignty in European history. The Americn Historical Review, 111(1).
Sinclair, A., & Byers, M. (2007). When us scholars speak of ‘sovereignty’, what do they mean? Political Studies, 55(2), 318–340. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467- 9248.2007.00665.x
Sovereignty in an emerging multipolar world
© The Africa Governance Papers, 2023, Vol 1 Issue 3 17
The Africa Governance Papers
Strydom, H. (2007). The non-aligned movement and the reform of international relations. Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law Online, 11(1), 1–46. https:// doi.org/10.1163/18757413-90000002
The White House. (2022). National security strategy.
Turner, S. (2009). Russia, China and a multipolar world order: The danger in the undefined. Asian Perspective, 33(1), 159–184. https://doi.org/10.1353/ apr.2009.0029
Van Munster, R. (2004). The war on terrorism: When the exception becomes the rule. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique, 17(2), 141–153. https://doi.org/10.1023/ B:SELA.0000033618.13410.02
Zeihan, P. (2020). Disunited Nations: The Scramble for Power in an Ungoverned World. HarperCollins.